Health & Medical Question

Description

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Health & Medical Question
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Discussion Prompt 1:

  • Explain why nitroglycerine is usually not given orally and why different routes of administration are utilized. What effect do the different routes of administration have on the bioavailability of the drug.

Response Prompt 1:

  • Identify and describe another drug that is not given orally and explain why. How does the alternate route of administration affect bioavailibity?
Main Posting: Response to the discusion question is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

44 (44%) – 44 (44%)

  • Thoroughly responds to the discusion question(s)

    • Is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

    • Supported by at least 3 current, credible sources

  • 40 (40%) – 43 (43%)

  • Responds to the discusion question(s)

    • Is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module.

    • 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth

    • Supported by at least 3 credible references

  • 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

  • Responds to most of the discusion question(s)

    • Is somewhat reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module.

    • 50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth

    • Supported by at least 3 credible references

  • 31 (31%) – 34 (34%)

  • Responds to some of the discusion question(s)

    • One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addresed

    • Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

    • Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

    • Post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references

  • 0 (0%) – 30 (30%)

  • Does not respond to the discusion question(s)

    • Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria

    •lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

    • Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

    • Contains only 1 or no credible references

  • Main Posting: Writing

    6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

  • Written clearly and concisely

    • Contains no grammatical or spelling errors

    • Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

  • 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

  • Written clearly and concisely

    • May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error

    • Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

  • 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

  • Written concisely

    • May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error

    • Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

  • 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

  • Writtten somewhat concisely

    • May contain more than two2 spelling or grammatical errors

    • Contains some APA formatting erros

  • 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

  • Not written clearly or concisely

    • Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors

    • Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style

  • Main Posting: Timely and full participation

    10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

  • Meets requirements for timely and full participation

    • Posts main discussion by due date

  • 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

    0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

  • Does not meet requirement for full participation
  • First Reponse

    Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

    9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

  • Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

    • Responds to questions posed by faculty

    • The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

  • 8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)

  • Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
  • 7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)

  • Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting
  • 6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)

  • Response is on topic, may have some depth
  • 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

  • Reponse may not be on topic, lacks depth
  • First Reponse: Writing

    6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

  • Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

    • Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed

    • Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

    • Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

  • 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

  • Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

    • Response to faculty questions are answered if posed

    • Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

    • Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

  • 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

  • Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues

    • Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

    • Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

    • Response is written in Standard Edited English

  • 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

  • Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

    • Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

    • Few or no credible sources are cited

  • 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

  • Responses posted in the discussion lack effective

    • Response to faculty questions are missing

    • No credible sources are cited

  • First Reponse: Timely and full participation

    5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

  • Meets requirements for timely and full participation

    • Posts by due date

  • 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

    0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

  • Does not meet requirement for full participation
  • Second Reponse: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

    9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

  • Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

    • Responds to questions posed by faculty

    • The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

  • 8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)

  • Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
  • 7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)

  • Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting
  • 6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)

  • Response is on topic, may have some depth
  • 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

  • Response may not be on topic, lacks depth
  • Second Reponse: Writing

    6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

  • Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

    • Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed

    • Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

    • Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

  • 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

  • Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

    • Response to faculty questions are answered if posed

    • Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

    • Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

  • 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

  • Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues

    • Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

    • Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

    • Response is written in Standard Edited English

  • 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

  • Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

    • Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

    • Few or no credible sources are cited

  • 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

    >• Responses posted in the discussion lack effective

    • Response to faculty questions are missing

    • No credible sources are cited

    Second Reponse: Timely and full participation

    5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

  • Meets requirements for timely and full participation

    • Posts by due date

  • 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

  • Does not meet requirement for full participation
  • Total Points: 100

    Name: NRNP_6566_Week1_Discussion_Rubric

    Order your essay today and save 20% with the discount code: ESSAYHELP

    Order a unique copy of this paper

    550 words
    We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
    Total price:
    $26
    Top Academic Writing Service Ready to Help
    with Your Essays, Assignments, and Research

    Order your essay today and save 20% with the discount code ESSAYHELP